MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7155453940

Measurement of the branching fraction and ▫$CP$▫-violating asymmetry of the decay ▫$B^0 to pi^0 pi^0$▫ using 387 million ▫$Upsilon (4S)$▫ decays in Belle II data

2025· article· en· W7155453940 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ichiro Adachi, J. Borah, Marko Bračko, Gaetano de Marino, P. Feichtinger, Eldar Ganiev, Samo Korpar, Peter Križan, Rok Pestotnik, I. Prudiiev, Tomaž Podobnik, Marko Starič, Luka Šantelj, Valentina Zhukova

Bibliographic record

VenueDiRROS repository (University of Maribor) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesCentro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico NacionalAkademi Sains MalaysiaVietnam Academy of Science and TechnologyMinistry of Education and Science of UkraineBundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und ForschungKorea Research Environment Open NetworkNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science and Technology CouncilKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseKorea Institute of Science and Technology InformationKorea Institute of Science and TechnologyDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronThailand Center of Excellence in PhysicsGeneralitat ValencianaKing Saud UniversityNational Science FoundationUniversity of TabukCompute CanadaAustrian Science FundNational Research FoundationNational Research Foundation of UkraineJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian FederationU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsAsymmetryBranching fractionBranching (polymer chemistry)Particle decayFraction (chemistry)Electron–positron annihilation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDiRROS repository (University of Maribor)Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207