Autobiografías drogadas. Texto drogado y escritura autobiográfica en la literatura hispánica del XXI: De Levrero a Escohotado
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: Este trabajo analiza obras literarias de carácter autobiográfico producidas en el ámbito hispánico y en cuyo desarrollo temático tiene relevancia la droga y la relación del autor con la sustancia. Partiendo de los estudios de Castoldi y Labrador sobre los vínculos entre literatura y droga, y los sintagmas de texto drogado y literatura drogada, respectivamente, se pretende rastrear una temática arraigada en otras tradiciones literarias y que tiene una aparición reciente en el contexto hispánico. Se examinan seis obras de cinco escritores: el uruguayo Mario Levrero, los mexicanos Julián Herbert y Carlos Velázquez, así como los españoles Daniel Jiménez y Antonio Escohotado. El objetivo principal es ofrecer una panorámica amplia del surgimiento de estas autobiografías drogadas en la narrativa hispánica del siglo XXI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".