Summary Report of Influenza Season 2000/2001
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Influenza activity was generally mild throughout the 2000/2001 influenza season. In the United States, influenza A (H1N1) predominated throughout the season. This was the first season that influenza A (H3N2) did not predominate in the US since the 1995/1996 influenza season. Influenza activity peaked during late January and early February. In Canada influenza B predominated during this season. In Europe, influenza A (H1N1) activity was reported until the end of February, after which influenza B became the predominant circulating strain in most European countries. Influenza C was reported from France (for the first time since 1981) during week 9, 2001. Sporadic reports of influenza A (H3N2) from Spain occurred during week 10, 2001. In England, Scotland and Wales levels of influenza activity and other respiratory illness remained low this season. GP consultations for influenza and flu-like illness peaked in February, but remained at the lower end of the range for normal seasonal activity before quickly declining. Influenza activity was initially associated with influenza A (H1N1), as with most of Europe. Influenza B became the predominant circulating strain as the season progressed. In Hong Kong, influenza A (H5N1) was recently detected in poultry markets, this has resulted in the slaughter of over one million poultry. No human cases of H5N1 virus have been detected during this outbreak.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".