MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7155666172

Identification of Cercospora spp. on Corn in North America and Baseline Flutriafol Fungicide Sensitivity

2025· article· en· W7155666172 on OpenAlex
Nik Nikzainalalam, Drake Copeland, Matthew Wiggins, Darcy Telenko, Kiersten Wise, Nathan M. Kleczewski, Tamra Jackson-Ziems, Alison Robertson, Gary Bergstrom, Albert Tenuta, Austin McCoy, Janette Jacobs, Martin Chilvers

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFungal Plant Pathogen Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCercosporaFungicideLeaf spotInoculationBenomylSowing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gray leaf spot (GLS) is an important corn disease reportedly caused by Cercospora zeae-maydis and C. zeina. Recently, flutriafol, a demethylation inhibitor (azole) fungicide, received Environmental Protection Agency registration as Xyway LFR, a product that is applied at planting for management of fungal diseases in corn, including suppression of GLS. In this study, 448 Cercospora spp. isolates were collected in 2020 and 2021 from symptomatic corn leaf samples submitted from the United States and Ontario, Canada. The Cercospora spp. were identified using multilocus genotyping of the internal transcribed spacer, elongation factor 1-α, calmodulin, histone H3, and actin genes. Based on the multilocus phylogenetic analyses, six species were identified; C. cf. flagellaris (n = 77), C. kikuchii (n = 4), C. zeae-maydis (n = 361), Cercospora sp. M (n = 2), Cercospora sp. Q (n = 1), and Cercospora sp. T (n = 3). In subsequent pathogenicity tests using selected isolates from each of these species, only C. zeae-maydis resulted in symptoms on corn, with no disease symptoms observed after inoculation with C. cf. flagellaris, C. kikuchii, Cercospora sp. M, Cercospora sp. Q, and Cercospora sp. T. Disease symptoms were observed on soybean following inoculation with C. cf. flagellaris, C. kikuchii, and Cercospora sp. Q, but not the other three species. Fungicide sensitivity of Cercospora spp. to flutriafol was assessed using a subset of 340 isolates. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to inhibit the growth of Cercospora spp. completely was determined based on growth of each species on flutriafol-amended clarified V8 agar at nine concentrations. The effective concentration of fungicide required for 50% growth inhibition (EC50) was also calculated from the same trial by measuring relative growth as compared with the nonamended control. Cercospora zeae-maydis was sensitive to flutriafol, with mean MIC values of 2.5 μg/ml and EC50 values ranging from 0.016 to 1.020 μg/ml with a mean of 0.346 μg/ml. Cercospora cf. flagellaris, C. kikuchii, Cercospora sp. M, Cercospora sp. Q, and Cercospora sp. T had mean EC50 values of 1.25, 7.14, 2.48, 1.81, and 2.24 μg/ml, respectively. These findings will assist in monitoring the sensitivity to the flutriafol fungicide in Cercospora spp. populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it