MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7155952844 · doi:10.35718/sepakat.v4i4.8481509

OPTIMALISASI FASILITAS FISIK DALAM RANGKA MENDUKUNG PEMBELAJARAN DI SDN 015 BALIKPAPAN UTARA, KOTA BALIKPAPAN

2025· article· W7155952844 on OpenAlexaff
Andi Sahputra Depari, Muhammad Alfarehzi Pramana, Anissa Nurindah Fitriana, Sherly Arana Deswinta Maharani, Adella Rizfah Azzahra, Tari Mentari, Owen Sebastian, Nicolas Saputra

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar Nasional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (SEPAKAT) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Education
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork environmentGloveboxIndustrial chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pendidikan dasar memiliki peran penting dalam membentuk karakter dan kemampuan intelektual siswa sejak dini. Meskipun demikian, masih banyak sekolah dasar yang menghadapi kendala dalam menciptakan suasana pembelajaran yang edukatif dan menyenangkan. Salah satunya adalah SDN 015 Balikpapan yang berlokasi di Karang Joang, dimana sekolah tersebut memiliki potensi besar dalam pengembangan lingkungan belajar, namun pemanfaatannya hingga belum optimal. Permasalahan utama yang dihadapi adalah penataan lingkungan sekolah yang kurang menarik serta minimnya media informasi edukatif yang mendukung proses pembelajaran, khususnya yang berbasis lingkungan. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, diusulkan pengembangan taman edukasi yang dilengkapi dengan papan informasi tanaman sebagai media pembelajaran interaktif. Metode pelaksanaan meliputi observasi lapangan, identifikasi kebutuhan, perancangan taman, pembuatan papan informasi, serta sosialisasi kepada warga sekolah. Hasil dari program ini menunjukkan peningkatan minat siswa terhadap pembelajaran berbasis lingkungan dan adanya peluang peningkatan kemampuan bahasa Inggris melalui media bilingual pada papan informasi. Kebaruan dari program ini terletak pada integrasi pembelajaran lingkungan dengan peningkatan literasi bahasa asing dalam bentuk taman edukasi tematik. Inovasi ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan dan membentuk budaya belajar yang lebih aktif dan menyenangkan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminar Nasional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (SEPAKAT)Same topicChild Development and EducationFrench-language works237,207