KOLABORASI MULTIDISIPLIN UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN LINGKUNGAN RT: PEMETAAN, DAN INFRASTRUKTUR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kegiatan ini dilaksanakan di RT 38 Kelurahan Gunung Samarinda, Balikpapan Utara, sebagai bentuk pengabdian masyarakat berbasis kolaborasi multidisiplin. Kegiatan ini merespons isu lingkungan seperti belum adanya peta administrasi wilayah, fasilitas umum yang tidak memadai, dan sistem pengelolaan sampah yang belum optimal. Empat fokus program utama dirancang, meliputi: pembuatan peta wilayah, perencanaan desain posyandu dan pos kamling beserta RAB, pemasangan papan nama jalan dan gang, serta pembentukan Bank Sampah berbasis partisipasi warga. Metode pelaksanaan terbagi dalam tiga tahap: persiapan, pelaksanaan, dan evaluasi. Partisipasi aktif warga dan mitra RT sangat berperan dalam kelancaran kegiatan. Meskipun menghadapi beberapa kendala teknis dan administratif, program berjalan dengan baik dan menghasilkan luaran nyata bagi masyarakat. Kegiatan ini tidak hanya memberikan dampak fisik bagi lingkungan, tetapi juga memperkuat keterlibatan warga dalam pembangunan wilayah. Pengabdian masyarakat ini diharapkan menjadi model pengembangan kawasan berbasis kolaborasi antarbidang keilmuan dan partisipasi masyarakat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".