MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7156200620 · doi:10.35718/sepakat.v4i5.8481745

REVITALISASI IDENTITAS WILAYAH RT 25 DI DESA WANATIRTA BALIKPAPAN

2025· article· W7156200620 on OpenAlexaff
Olivia Febrianty Ngabito, Maryo Inri Pratama, Immanuel G. Mahulae, Ragil Siratramdanin, Syifa Isnina Syafitri, Fila Nurliana, Zilvany Amalia, Sandy Ferdiansyah

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar Nasional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (SEPAKAT) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitectural and Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQualitative researchPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Program Kuliah Kerja Nyata (KKN) ini diselenggarakan oleh mahasiswa Institut Teknologi Kalimantan dengan mengusung tema Revitalisasi Identitas Wilayah RT 25 di Desa Wanatirta Balikpapan. Desa Wanatirta, yang terletak di KM 15 Karang Joang, Balikpapan, memiliki potensi besar di bidang pertanian, perkebunan, dan pariwisata alam. Namun, keterbatasan fasilitas seperti denah kawasan, papan informasi, dan nomor rumah yang jelas masih menjadi kendala dalam pengembangan desa. Masalah ini menghambat navigasi serta penataan lingkungan, dan berdampak pada pelayanan publik.Kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat yang akan dilaksanakan di Desa Wanatirta bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan menyelesaikan permasalahan ini melalui berbagai program dan inisiatif. Dengan melibatkan mahasiswa, masyarakat setempat, dan pihak terkait, diharapkan permasalahan ini dapat diselesaikan secara efektif dan berkelanjutan, sehingga Desa Wanatirta dapat berkembang menjadi desa yang lebih teratur, nyaman, dan mudah diakses oleh semua pihak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminar Nasional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (SEPAKAT)Same topicArchitectural and Urban StudiesFrench-language works237,207