MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7160317399 · doi:10.32865/2346/101575

Equitable and Inclusive Public Outreach with the James Webb Space Telescope: Combining Art, Science, and Technology

2024· article· en· W7160317399 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elaine Stewart, Ashley Zelinskie, Maggie Masetti, Kan Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Rights and Representation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutreachJames Webb Space TelescopeAgency (philosophy)Space (punctuation)HumanityInclusion (mineral)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NASA's James Webb Space Telescope revealed its first images on July 12, 2022 and has been doing groundbreaking science ever since. Communication is essential for involving the public in NASA's discoveries of our universe. Scientific exploration transcends international borders; it united humanity to make a mission like Webb feasible in collaboration with the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Canadian Space Agency Art is a medium that can transcend the boundaries of language, culture, and ability. It can serve as a bridge for communication between technical and non-technical communities through its use of different avenues to express the beauty and nuance of science and engineering in ways that may not be readily accessible to those outside of technical communities of practice. However, equitable and inclusive outreach endeavors are challenging to implement while considering language translations, culture context, sensory methods, and technology capabilities. Formats including the "Unfolding the Universe'' virtual reality (VR) platform have allowed for a wider audience to interact with Webb's images, including sounds, visual aids, and talks by the scientists and engineers who worked on Webb. This VR platform has been expanded to highlight the ESA contributors to the mission and will be showcased internationally. Webb's first images were also translated into sounds as a method of inclusion for those with sight disabilities. We will explore some successful outreach methods and provide suggestions for inclusivity in future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.009
Scholarly communication0.0120.013
Open science0.0010.025
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDisability Rights and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207