MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CFD-Based Assessment of Heat Transfer Fluid Temperature Effects on Multi-Stage Latent Thermal Energy Storage for CSP Energy Management

2025· article· W7160399714 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad W. Omari, Basil Ibrahim, Hamdy M. Mohamed, Hend Elzefzafy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Change Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat transferThermal management of electronic devices and systemsLatent heatThermal energy storageThermal energyThermalEnergy (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a computational investigation of latent thermal energy storage (LHTES) systems integrated with multi-stage phase change materials (PCMs) for concentrated solar power (CSP) plants. The novelty of this research lies in analyzing the effect of elevating heat transfer fluid (HTF) inlet temperature on the melting dynamics of PCMs, with a focus on charging time and melting rate. A cascaded PCM configuration, employing Octadecanoic Acid, RT58, and Dodecanoic Acid, was modeled to capture sequential melting across distinct temperature ranges, thereby extending system efficiency. Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with the SIMPLE algorithm in ANSYS Fluent, simulations were conducted under controlled flow velocity while varying HTF temperatures from 100°C to 180°C. The findings reveal that increasing HTF temperature significantly accelerates PCM melting, reducing total charging time by over 65% at elevated conditions, while maintaining stable temperature layering that minimizes thermal shock. This work contributes critical insights into optimizing TES integration within CSP plants, demonstrating how strategic thermal management can enhance efficiency, reliability, and sustainability of renewable energy generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhase Change Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207