MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7160567522

OP367 - Evidence from Mitochondrial DNA Sequences Suggest a Recent Origin for Peromyscus truei comanche

2020· article· en· W7160567522 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThinkTech (Texas Tech University) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesPhylogenetic treePopulationMitochondrial DNAGenetic divergenceDendrogramPhylogeneticsGenetic distance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Isolated populations of Peromyscus truei comanche occur in the Tule and Palo Duro Canyon region of the Texas Panhandle.Four plausible routes that may explain the current distribution of the pion mouse were investigated herein by comparing the phylogenetic relationships of P. t. comanche with eight other subspecies of P. truei from throughout the western and southwestern United States and the Baja Peninsula of Mexico.To determine the origin and affiliation of P. t. comanche populations, DNA sequence data were obtained from the mitochondrial cytochrome-b gene (1,143 bp) and displacement loop (971 bp) and analyzed in a phylogenetic context.Results of the Bayesian inference analyses indicated that samples of P. t. comanche genetically were undifferentiated from two of the eight subspecies of P. truei (P.t. nevadensis and P. t. truei).Overall, genetic divergence values, obtained from the cytochrome-b gene, ranged from 1.16% to 4.99% between P. t. comanche and the other eight subspecies of P. truei.Peromyscus truei comanche differed genetically from the nearest population of P. t. truei (Glenrio, Texas) by 1.73%; however, samples of P. t. comanche were differentiated from individual populations of P. t. truei from Mills Canyon, New Mexico, Black Mesa, Oklahoma, and Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Texas by 0.79%, 1.00%, and 2.00%, respectively.Although results of the phylogenetic analyses were unable to definitively explain the origin of P. t. comanche, levels of genetic divergence suggest a recent evolutionary history with samples from Mills Canyon, New Mexico.Results from the divergence dating analyses suggest that P. t. comanche from the Texas Panhandle diverged from a source-stock population in northeastern New Mexico approximately 0.71 mya.This infers an expansion route (Route II) from Mills Canyon, New Mexico, along canyonlands associated with the Canadian River system to the northeastern edge of the Llano Estacado, and subsequent isolation and divergence of P. t. comanche from its P. t. truei-like ancestor; whereas the closest extant populations of P. t. truei in Glenrio, Texas genetically were more divergent (1.73%), and also would have required dispersal across the inhospitable landscape (for P. truei) of the Llano Estacado.Finally, P. t. comanche did not form a monophyletic group (to the exclusion of other samples of P. t. truei) in the genetic analyses, however the significant levels of morphological differentiation reported in other studies justifies its retention as a valid subspecies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThinkTech (Texas Tech University)Same topicBat Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207