The Challenge of Decimating Poverty in Latin America by 2010
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Probablemente sea aún muy pronto para llegar a cualquier conclusión definitiva sobre el efecto de los ajustes estructurales a la distribución de ingresos y su efecto sobre la evolución de la pobreza en América Latina; sin embargo, este trabajo intenta evaluar las tendencias arriba mencionadas en siete países lationamericanos durante la década de los ochenta. La evidencia que aquí se presenta apunta hacia una correlación entre los procesos de cambio acelerado en los regímenes de comercio de tales países y una tendencia hacia la concentración de los ingresos. A la vez, este artículo subraya que los países con un proceso gradual de reformas comerciales han mostrado un mejoramiento en su distribución del ingreso.ABSTRACTIt is probably too early to draw any definite conclusions on the effect of structural adjustment in the distribution of income, and the evolution of poverty in Latin America. This paper, however, represents an attempt to assess income distribution trends and the evolution of poverty in seven Latin American countries during the 1980's. The evidence presented here points at a correlation between processes of rapid change in the countries' trade regimes, and a tendency toward the concentration of income. At the same time, this article emphasizes how countries with a gradual process of trade reform have shown an improvement in their distribution of income.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it