MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7160914840 · doi:10.1121/10.0040478

A revised seawater sound-speed equation consistent with deep acoustic travel times in the Beaufort Gyre

2025· article· en· W7160914840 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heriberto J. Vazquez, Bruce D. Cornuelle, Peter F. Worcester, Matthew Dzieciuch, John Colosi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOcean gyreBeaufort seaArcticSeawaterSound (geography)Speed of soundAnomaly (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Travel-time measurements from an ocean acoustic tomography array deployed in the central Beaufort Gyre during 2016–2017 for the Canada Basin Acoustic Propagation Experiment (CANAPE) have been previously used to test the accuracy of the internationally accepted sound-speed equation (TEOS-10) [Vazquez et al. (2023), J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 154, 2676–2688] concluding that TEOS-10 gives sound speeds at high pressure (>1000 m) and low temperature (<0°C) that are too high by 0.14–0.16 m s−1. Here, a revised seawater sound-speed equation is developed that is consistent with the CANAPE travel times. First, a revised seawater sound speed equation is formulated using maximum a posteriori estimates based on laboratory data, defining the priors of the system in a reproducible manner. This equation is subsequently updated by fitting to the CANAPE travel times through iterative least-squares. CTD casts conducted in the Arctic are employed to assess the discrepancies between the revised sound-speed equation and other sound-speed equations. While including the deep acoustic transmissions corrects the portion below 1000 m depth, it also slightly corrects an additional anomaly between 100 and 300-m that corresponds to temperatures as low as −1.8°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207