MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7160928704 · doi:10.3917/spub.074.0341f

La culture sensible , Anthropologie et sociétés , Anthropologie et sociétés, Université Laval, février 2007

2007· article· fr· W7160928704 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hélène Kane

Bibliographic record

VenueSanté Publique · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Identity (music)Field (mathematics)Context (archaeology)Ethnography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RésuméCette étude porte sur les conditions d’implantation de programmes d’éducation thérapeutique concernant les patients vivant avec le VIH, dans 7 structures de soins réparties dans 4 pays à ressources limitées (Maroc, Sénégal, Congo, Cambodge). Les objectifs ont consisté à repérer comment l’éducation thérapeutique était intégrée dans la prise en charge des patients vivant avec le VIH dans ces différents contextes, apprécier la qualité du processus éducatif et identifier les éléments favorables à la pérennisation de l’éducation thérapeutique du patient. La méthodologie d’évaluation s’est appuyée sur les critères et indicateurs de qualité d’un programme d’éducation thérapeutique. Les résultats montrent que l’intégration de l’éducation thérapeutique dans chacune des structures évaluées est réelle mais qu’elle varie en fonction d’éléments liés au contexte de soins, aux acteurs de santé et au niveau de reconnaissance institutionnelle de l’éducation thérapeutique. La pérennisation de ces programmes était, au moment de l’étude, assurée par le soutien des coordinateurs de programme auprès des équipes formées et par l’inscription progressive de l’éducation thérapeutique dans les politiques de santé régionales ou nationales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0840.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSanté PubliqueSame topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207