FEDERALISM A DYNAMIC CONCEPT: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FEDERALISM IN THE CONSTITUTIONS OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INDIA AND IRAQ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the three older Federations of the U.S.A., Canada and Australia, in the formative stages of development, the dominant operative concept was that of competitive federalism which denoted a spirit of competition and rivalry between the center and the states. The formative stages were, therefore, marked by intergovernmental disputed, the units were very conscious of their powers and rights and thus, resented the growth of the center’s powers and any encroachment by it on their domain.With the passage of time, however, the concept of 'competitive federalism' slowly gave way to co-operative federalism. This trend has been promoted by three powerful factors.The crux, the pivotal point of a federal constitution is the division of powers and functions between the center and the states.The Indian constitution contains a very elaborate scheme of distribution of powers and functions between the center and the states. India from commencement of the constitution is observing competitive federalism between center and states, now which resulting in co-operative federalism. In spite of provisions relating to federalism, there still exists a problematic condition about the future of federalism in Iraq and the reason is due to certain innovations and ambiguities in Iraqi constitution and also legal and political problems about federation in that country. The present article examines these ambiguities and innovations.It is argued that institutional features of federalism and realities on the ground make Iraq uniquely vulnerable to secessionist pressures. The purpose of the proposed Research work is to make a comparative study of federalisms of U.S.A. being the oldest federalism, India as largest democracy possessing federal character and Iraq as recent conflicting federalism to know there working and to suggest necessary improvements if required for better working of federalisms in those countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".