“Living like a Lady”: Maimie Jacobs’s Vernacular Charity in Montreal’s Red-Light District, 1914–1918
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Having previously sold sex herself before opening her “Montreal Mission for Friendless girls,” Maimie Jacobs (a.k.a. Pinzer) took an unusually sympathetic approach to providing healthcare, shelter, and employment opportunities to women working the city’s streets. This research draws two sets of letters Jacobs wrote to her benefactors: letters to Fanny Quincy Howe that were published as The Maimie Papers in 1977 under the pseudonym Maimie Pinzer, and previously unknown letters she wrote to George Herbert Welsh. The differences between these two sets of correspondence offer insight into Jacobs’s strategies for securing the funds required for her rescue work and further details about her life before and after the letters she wrote to Howe. I argue that Jacobs’s flexible, anti-institutional ethos of care was a vernacular form of charity, characterized by its legibility within the logics of the red-light district. Her approach reformulated established charitable practices and contemporary expectations around sexuality to offer young women a malleable respectability that took the form of a set of skills rather than expectations. Challenging the linear and vertical orientation of “progressive” era charity, Jacobs’s insight into the appeal of transactional sex, her spatial analysis of the red-light district, and her understanding of social morality and mobility reflected the worth and work of transactional sex in the early-twentieth century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".