Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteure explore sa vision de la transmission ainsi que la place qu’y occupe la pratique de l’écriture. Au coeur de l’acte d’écriture, l’importance de cultiver une écoute sensible non emprisonnée dans des concepts, mais ouverte à l’Infantile qui infiltre la parole. En effet, la transmission ne saurait se limiter au savoir partagé, elle est inséparable de l’expérience de l’analyse. Mais qu’en est-il lorsque l’analyste tente de transmettre l’expérience de la cure via l’écriture ? Comment rendre compte de cette expérience si particulière ? Est-il possible de préserver le mouvement de la séance, sa vivance, la passion du transfert, sans les dénaturer ? L’acte d’écriture est aussi une manière de témoigner de la part traumatique inhérente à toute cure en la partageant avec nos pairs. Ce métier impossible, comme se plaisait à le rappeler Freud, ne se pratique pas seul. Ce n’est qu’en soumettant notre pratique à une écoute autre que nous pourrons renouveler la nôtre et éviter les pièges de la passion suscitée par les transferts et qui mènent parfois à des dérives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".