MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161295490 · doi:10.7202/1125197ar

Précarité et troubles psychiques en parentalité : le paradigme des incapacités parentales en contexte de protection de l’enfance

2025· article· fr· W7161295490 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emmanuelle Bonneville-Baruchel

Bibliographic record

VenueFiligrane Écoutes psychothérapiques · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScapegoatContext (archaeology)IndignationSocial assistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les parents des enfants confiés aux services de Protection de l’enfance présentent une problématique d’incompétence parentale, souvent associée à une problématique d’incapacité parentale, momentanée ou chronique, partielle ou totale. L’incapacité parentale procède de troubles psychiques personnels ou de maladies psychiatriques qui entravent l’acquisition ou la mobilisation des capacités et ressources psychiques fortement mises à l’épreuve en situation de responsabilité parentale. L’efficience de ces capacités est pourtant indispensable pour pouvoir répondre adéquatement aux besoins fondamentaux de l’enfant et garantir ainsi sa santé mentale ainsi que son développement psycho-affectif, cognitif et social sans négligence et sans maltraitance. Différencier les problématiques d’incompétence et d’incapacité dans l’évaluation des situations de dysparentalité en protection de l’enfance permet d’adapter les projets de vie pour les enfants, les objectifs de soins et d’assistance aux familles, en protégeant le développement de l’enfant. Fondé sur une approche psychodynamique, cet article propose des pistes de compréhension des différents types de dysparentalité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFiligrane Écoutes psychothérapiquesSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207