Bibliographic record
Abstract
A growing number of states, including the UK, France, and Canada, are moving to recognize Palestinian statehood.While this move has the potential to be strategically harnessed to advance Palestinian rights, it equally bears the risk of normalizing the genocide of the Palestinian people in Gaza while stabilizing the status quo of Israel's colonial rule and stunting the potential of genuine selfdetermination.The greatest promise of this renewed statehood bid, the most recent push being in 2011-12, is a united front to challenge U.S. intransigent support for Israel.Since becoming Israel's primary ally following the 1967 War, the United States has leveraged its role as a global superpower to systematically shield Israel from accountability and undermine multilateral efforts to advance Palestinian self-determination.Most recently, U.S. support for Israel has featured the unimpeded flow of weapons, the imposition of sanctions on the International Criminal Court for issuing arrest warrants for Israeli leaders, and, most notably, issuing five security council vetoes against a ceasefire.The statehood bid is the first coordinated effort by European states to confront U.S. policy and that momentum is much needed.But their push for Palestinian statehood is not only inadequate, but it also sidesteps non-derogable rights belonging to the Palestinian people.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".