MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161407854 · doi:10.4103/ijoc.ijoc_14_25

When asthma meets pulmonary hypertension or peripartum cardiomyopathy in pregnancy: A systematic review and proposal for an integrated heart–lung perinatal care model

2025· article· en· W7161407854 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Efendi Lukas, Wiku Andonotopo, Mochammad Besari Adi Pramono, Julian Dewantiningrum, Wisnu Prabowo, Muhammad Adrianes Bachnas, I Nyoman Hariyasa Sanjaya, Anak Agung Gede Putra Wiradnyana, Anak Agung Ngurah Jaya Kusuma, Khanisyah Erza Gumilar, Ernawati Darmawan, Muhammad Ilham Aldika Akbar, Dudy Aldiansyah, Aloysius Suryawan, Ridwan Abdullah Putra, Anita Deborah Anwar, Laksmana Adi Krista Nugraha, Waskita Ekamaheswara Kasumba Andanaputra, Wibisana Andika Krista Dharma, Milan Stanojevic

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsthmaSystematic reviewPeripartum cardiomyopathyPulmonary hypertensionDecompensationPregnancyMultidisciplinary approachMEDLINEBiomarker

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Pregnancy presents a unique cardiopulmonary stress test, during which asthma, pulmonary hypertension (PH), and peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) may intersect through shared hypoxemic, inflammatory, and endothelial pathways. This systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines to integrate evidence across respiratory, cardiac and obstetric disciplines. Comprehensive searches of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library grey sources up to May 2025 identified 1380 records. After duplicate removal and screening, 40 studies met the inclusion criteria; 20 high-quality core studies were synthesised using AMSTAR-2, ROBINS-I and Newcastle–Ottawa frameworks. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and integrated narratively by mechanistic domain and clinical phase. The synthesis demonstrates that asthma-related hypoxemia, eosinophilic inflammation and oxidative stress potentiate pulmonary vasoconstriction and right-ventricular strain, bridging towards PH and PPCM. Maternal mortality in modern PH pregnancies remains elevated despite improved multidisciplinary management, while uncontrolled asthma is consistently associated with preterm birth and foetal growth restriction. A new Integrated Heart–Lung Perinatal Care Model is proposed, defining oxygenation targets, biomarker thresholds and team-based escalation criteria to harmonise obstetric, pulmonary and cardiac care. Research priorities include precision asthma phenotyping, validation of oxygen-target algorithms, AI-supported early detection of decompensation and policy frameworks for equitable access to specialised care. This review followed PRISMA 2020 but was not prospectively registered. It establishes the first comprehensive framework uniting the mechanistic, clinical and policy dimensions of the asthma–PH/PPCM overlap in pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.090
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.147
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0900.147
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.017
Bibliometrics0.0140.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Journal of CardiologySame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207