Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distributed by Good DocsProduced by Acosia Red Elk, Brutis Baez, Brigette McConville, and Spring Alaska SchreinerDirected by Jesse Locke2023, Streaming, 90 mins Locke’s A Reflection of Life is a documentary highlighting the plight of the Indigenous community at large in the United States regarding access to a critical resource for supporting life: clean water. The documentary discusses the trials and tribulations of several tribes spanning from the Midwest to the Pacific Northwest. Locke’s film provides a platform to several affected groups that share a common lived experience: systematic oppression through the exploitation of nature. The documentary features a mix of interviewees that include members of the various affected Indigenous communities across the US, as well as climate scholars and activists. Locke’s creative use of alternating between the tribal perspective and the scholarly perspective effectively highlights two rather different types of authority: lived and learned. The tribal members provide a humanistic voice by discussing their spiritual and cultural ties to the land as well as some historical context. The scholars in the documentary offer scientific and political explanations, providing a foundation for understanding the conflict from multiple perspectives. For example, a Pacific Northwest tribal community struggles with access to clean water due to dumping upriver, and the cultural importance of those rivers is highlighted. A scholar then highlights climate-related issues that are exacerbating problems downriver. This example perfectly blends the large-scale climate issues that are impacting a local community on levels that range from managing boil notices to the gradual extinction of spiritually important wildlife. A noteworthy aspect of Locke’s direction was the use of any indigenous narrative voice while also intentionally excluding maps and geographic data. Some of the interviewees touch on the concept of tribal ownership, specifically of knowledge. Throughout the film, there are anecdotes of discrimination experienced by tribal communities, often resulting in the desecration of their lands. While it may appear exclusive, it establishes the importance of boundaries to the viewer, whom is likely an outsider to the recorded communities. In conclusion, I highly recommend A Reflection of Life to students and advocates. The film touches on a variety of concepts that include tribal authority, environmentalism, and advocacy that may benefit current and future scholars and advocates. Awards:Best feature film, Toronto Documentary Film Festival; Best environmental film, Montreal Independent Film Festival
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.066 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".