Wiedemannia similis Vaillant 1960
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wiedemannia similis Vaillant, 1960 (Fig. 22) Wiedemannia (Wiedemannia) similis Vaillant, 1960b: 178. Type locality (by lectotype designation): Viskharvi, River Pyandzh, Tajikistan. Wiedemannia (Wiedemannia) similis: Chvála & Wagner, 1989: 324 (catalogue); Sinclair, 1995: 716. Type material examined. LECTOTYPE (here designated in order to fix identity of the species), ♂ labelled (Fig. 22) [printed in Cyrillic] [Tajikistan]: “Viskharvi on r. [=reka, river]/ Pyandzh, Taj. [=Tajikistan]/ 21.x.[1]942, Stackelberg”; “ LECTOTYPE / Wiedemannia / (Wiedemannia) similis / Vaillant, 1960/ des. Sinclair, Shamshev,/ Gattolliat 2020 [red label]”; “ Wiedemannia (Wiedemannia) / similis VAILLANT ♂ / Défilé de Viskharvi, Massif/ de Darvaz, Tadzikistan./ 21.X.1942 / A.A. STACKELBERG coll./ F. VAILLANT”; “ GBIFCH/ 00606847 ” (MZLS, slide). PARALECTOTYPES: Tajikistan: same data as lectotype (2 ♀♀, ZIN); Tavil-dara, N slope of Darvazskiy Ridge, 9.x.1942, A.A. Stackelberg (2 ♀♀, ZIN). Remarks. Vaillant (1960b) did not designate a type specimen for this species. He listed one male and five female syntypes, of which one male and four females were found during this study. Acknowledgements. Christophe Daugeron (Paris Museum) is thanked for directing the search by BJS and IVS for the types of Vaillant to Lausanne. Jim O’Hara (Ottawa), Patrice Bouchard (Ottawa) and Neal Evenhuis (Honolulu) are thanked for discussions concerning type material status. Ian Quintas and Maud Liégeois (MZLS) greatly contributed to this study by inventorying and digitalizing the 1300 slides of the Empididae collection deposited by François Vaillant at MZLS. Alexey Kovalev helped to take photos in ZIN. The study of IVS was performed in the frames of the Russian State Research Project no. АААА – А19–119020690101 – 6. Marija Ivković and an anonymous reviewer kindly reviewed the manuscript.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".