MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161736302 · doi:10.59236/emro.v27i4a584

This is Our Everything

2025· article· W7161736302 on OpenAlex
Kristen Adams

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDialog boxStorytellingNatural (archaeology)Ideal (ethics)Power (physics)Latin AmericansSet (abstract data type)Focus (optics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed by epf media, 324 S. Beverly Drive, PMB 437, Beverly Hills, CA 90212; 310-839-1500Produced by Frederik Subei and Manuel DomesDirected by Frederik Subei2023, Streaming, 81 mins This documentary is set in Maranhão, Brazil and features the Guajajara and Awá cultures, who’s native land is being threatened by the logging industry. A group of Guajajara people take it upon themselves to defend their land, as there is no support from the government. It is a dangerous business, and the film captures the many aspects of the issue, as well as the lives and culture of the people involved. The film does so many things right and has all the components a great documentary should have, which unfortunately are often absent these days. It does well to focus on this one situation and place, and doesn't attempt to cover much else, as some films do. The pacing and length of the film is also spot on; it’s full of content and isn’t longer than it ought to be. There is a great balance of natural dialog taking place in the footage and interview or storytelling dialog to explain the history and present events. Also appreciated is the on-screen text with the speakers’ names and brief description of who they are. The documentary covers a number of subjects including, ethics, the logging business, deforestation, native peoples, human rights, area studies of Latin and South American, and current events. As a result, it would be ideal for classes in the social sciences or humanities, particularly geography, international studies, politics, or environmental studies. It’s certainly suitable for general adult or college audiences, however there are some graphic scenes that might not be appropriate for high school or younger viewers. Awards:Best Documentary, Santiago del Estero Film Festival, Argentina; Audience Award, The Natur Vision Film Festival, Germany; Rigoberta Menchú Community Award, Présence Autochtone International First Peoples' Festival, Canada; Jury Special Mention, WATCH DOCS International Film Festival, Poland

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it