MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161818058 · doi:10.5284/1142072

University Academy, Little London, Long Sutton, South Holland, Lincolnshire: Historic Building Survey

2025· article· en· W7161818058 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simon A Savage

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotographyFlash (photography)Quarter (Canadian coin)Block (permutation group theory)DoorsWindow (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The photographic survey took place during the autumn half-term holiday. Photography was undertaken in digital colour photography (using a 10.4 Mpixel format). Photography was undertaken of the school buildings to create an initial archive and included general shots of the site and detailed photography of room arrangement; main elevations and constructional details such as window openings, and fixtures and fittings, such as doors and window fenestration. Weather conditions were mixed on both days of recording, with occasional sunny intervals. Low light levels necessitated the use of flash in all interior situations and included some fill-in flash to penetrate the shadows in the exterior shots. The photographs were further supplemented by Room-based record sheets and Brickwork recording sheets. The original school, designed by Sir Anthony Wakefield Cox (an architect associated with many schools of this style in the mid-20th century), opened in 1959 as the Peele County Secondary School. It was built as part of the post-war ROSLA (Raising Of the School Leaving Age) scheme: it is typical of the new-build schools produced to centralised specifications in response to the needs of the period, when a substantial increase in education capacity had to be delivered rapidly and cheaply while taking the least possible amount of construction manpower from other projects. The Sports Hall, Block E and the southern part of Block D were added in 1970, part of a second wave of nationwide ROSLA development. Block D and the exterior of part of Block C were refurbished in 2021-22. University Academy, Long Sutton can be viewed as a typical example of a secondary school built in ROSLA architecture and retaining some of its original appearance: the school buildings represent the development of state secondary education in the mid- and late 20th century. Despite subsequent extensive refurbishment and repair the buildings remain readable: they retain some aspects of their original exterior design and much of their internal arrangement, although modernisation has resulted in the loss of much interior detail, with few surviving original fixtures and fittings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical Architecture and UrbanismFrench-language works237,207