MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161821170 · doi:10.82308/5179

L’imagination environnementale dans la littérature francophone du Québec au 20e siècle. De l’écriture-nature au nature writing

2025· dissertation· fr· W7161821170 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mariève Isabel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRACE (psycholinguistics)FrenchEcocriticismNousNatural (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The environmental imagination, understood as the ability to imagine and represent the environment, is undergoing a major transformation. In this era of ecological crisis, changes are observed across all disciplines, including literature. Faced with shaken certainties about the future, the idea of nature takes on a new meaning. The relationship of human beings to the world is questioned. A body of work has expressed, for several decades now, a new awareness about the different environments in which texts, characters, and non-human elements are anchored. In the United States, these texts are called nature writing, a concept that is beginning to appear in Quebec literature. In this thesis, I propose to trace the development of an awareness about nature in Francophone writings from Quebec. When and how does such an awareness, accompanied by new concerns, arise? In what forms? How and when does nature writing appears in Québec? Inspired by ecocriticism, the history of ideas, and literary history, I explore these questions drawing on a corpus in which issues of the relationship to nature are central. To do this, I delve into the writings of Brother Marie-Victorin, Saint-Denys Garneau, Gabrielle Roy, Pierre Morency, and Robert Lalonde. My analysis of their works demonstrates that interest in nature in Quebec literature begins to change in the 1930s, first through the lenses of natural sciences, then through personal prose. Authors turn to hybrid genres, challenging established literary categories, to deepen questions of nature and culture, in unclassifiable works that combine scientific observation, journal writing, epistolary, narrative, notes, and various degrees of autobiography to reflect on humans’ relationship to the world. In doing so, they develop a style that I will call écriture-nature. These findings will help outline and tell the story of the environmental imagination in Quebec literature

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0120.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureFrench-language works237,207