MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161822309 · doi:10.82308/11964

Delirium in the elderly : a survival analysis

2000· dissertation· en· W7161822309 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ritsuko Kakuma

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeliriumConfoundingProportional hazards modelMultivariate analysisOrganic mental disordersSurvival analysisPopulationMortality rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mortality rates have consistently been shown to be greater in patients with delirium compared to those without. Published work over the last decade has revealed however, that several confounding factors play key roles in contributing to the excess mortality in the delirium population and that statistical adjustment for these factors in multivariate analyses minimizes, if not eliminates, the association between delirium and mortality. These factors include pre-existing dementia, advanced age, severe medical illness, diminished functional status, and intoxication or withdrawal from medications. However, studies on prognosis and prognostic indicators of delirium in the past have been limited to subjects admitted to the hospital where the sample may include both incident and prevalent cases of delirium. Objective. To determine whether prevalent delirium is an independent predictor for mortality among elderly patients seen in the Emergency department. Potentially confounding factors were assessed to reveal their prognostic contributions in this population. Survival analysis was carried out using the Cox Proportional Hazards Modelling technique. Methods. As part of a larger study, 268 patients seen in the Emergency department in two Montreal hospitals (107 delirium cases, 161 controls) were followed up in 6 month intervals for a total of 18 months. Dates of deaths for the deceased were obtained from the Ministere de la Sante et des Service Sociaux. Results. The analysis revealed a non-significant association between delirium and mortality rate for the English speaking subjects, when adjusted for age, sex, pre-morbid cognitive decline (IQCODE), Basic ADL, Instrumental ADL, comorbidity, number of medication, education (years), eyesight, and hearing problems (p = 0.752, HR =1 .095, CI: 0.622--1.929). On the other hand, for the French speaking subjects, the same model revealed a highly significant association between delirium and death rate (p = 0.001, HR = 9.078, CI: 2.362--34.892). Possible explanations for the different results are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders→French-language works237,207→