MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161944419 · doi:10.82308/27808

A phase-imaging technique for precision mass measurements of neutron-rich nuclei with the Canadian Penning Trap mass spectrometer

2019· dissertation· en· W7161944419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Orford

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtomic massMass spectrometryPenning trapNuclear structureMass numberNuclear binding energyAccelerator mass spectrometryResolution (logic)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nuclear mass is a fundamental property of a nucleus because it defines the binding energy which represents the sum of all internal interactions. Masses provide insight into nuclear structure effects and are influential in describing heavy element nucleosynthesis via the rapid neutron-capture (??) process. More nuclear data, including masses, on the neutron-rich side of stability is needed to improve upon the current understanding of the ?? process. The Canadian Penning Trap (CPT) mass spectrometer is located at the CARIBU facility where intense beams of neutron-rich nuclei are created. To take advantage of the unique beams available at CARIBU an upgrade to the phase-imaging ion-cyclotron-resonance (PI-ICR) mass measurement technique at the CPT has been completed, vastly improving the experimental sensitivity. Compared to the previous system this new technique is faster, more efficient, and offers improved mass resolution and higher mass precision. In this thesis the implementation of PI-ICR at the CPT is detailed alongside a thorough study of the associated systematic effects. A total of 54 neutron-rich nuclear masses are presented ranging between mass numbers of ?? = 104-168, including 18 which have been measured for the first time and 29 where a reduction in the mass uncertainty has been made. The majority of the new measurements are of rare-earth elements near ?? = 100. Trends along several isotopic chains are discussed and the impact of these measurements in explaining a possible formation mechanism of the rare-earth elemental abundance peak during the ?? process is given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207