MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161947989 · doi:10.82308/54715

From clinically tested to newly discovered: validation of breast and ovarian cancer predisposing variants

2020· dissertation· en· W7161947989 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Supriya Behl

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBRCA gene mutations in cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPALB2Ovarian cancerBreast cancerGenetic testingGenotypingGermlineGenotypePopulationCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inherited germline pathogenic variants are responsible for ~5% of breast cancer and ~10% of ovarian cancer. BRCA1 and BRCA2 were established as breast cancer susceptibility genes over twenty-five years ago, and since then, several other genes have been seen to play a role in breast or ovarian cancer predisposition, such as PALB2 and RAD51C. Through rapid expansion and isolation since immigration in the early 17th century, French Canadians are a relatively genetically homogenous population due to genetic founder effects and therefore represent a unique demographic for genetic contributions to disease. To date, twenty variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 that likely predispose families to breast and ovarian cancer have been identified as recurring in French Canadians. The first objective of this thesis was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and validity of targeted genetic testing for these variants in Montreal French Canadians. A Sequenom genotyping assay identified a pathogenic variant in 0.2% (5 of 1940) of cancer-free controls, and 3.8% (21/555) of breast cancer cases unselected for age or family history. Of twenty variants tested, seven were identified in 12/113 (10%) of early onset cases. The option of providing this test as population-based screening is discussed. A proportion of high-risk patients remain without any known predisposing variants, and oftentimes gene panel testing results in variants of uncertain clinical significance. The second objective of this thesis was to characterize four variants of uncertain significance as likely benign or deleterious. One RAD51C (c.705G>T) variant was found to associate with ovarian cancer cases (3/888, 0.34%) in French Canadians (0/969 female controls). Initial functional analyses provide evidence that the variant is deleterious in vitro and may contribute to risk or progression of cancer. Taken together, the results of this thesis provide valuable information regarding both known and newly discovered breast and ovarian cancer predisposing variants in French Canadians

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBRCA gene mutations in cancer→French-language works237,207→