MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161962223 · doi:10.82308/1742

Skies of Inequality: Investigating the Interplay Between State Factors in Civil Aviation and Systemic Discrimination in Northern Canada

2025· dissertation· en· W7161962223 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
René David-Cooper

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousGovernment (linguistics)Civil aviationRacismHuman rightsAviationState (computer science)Global governanceCorporate governance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis embarks on a journey to uncover the dark truth surrounding the causal role of States in civil aviation accidents (State Factors) and the ensuing spectre of systemic discrimination that haunts indigenous populations in Northern Canada. Despite Canada's reputation for stringent aviation regulations, a closer examination reveals that systemic safety deficiencies in the North have resulted in a disproportionate impact on indigenous communities. Driven by the need to address these issues, this research contributes to broader discussions on human rights and the role of States in ensuring equitable safety outcomes in aviation. It provides a profound reflection on historical inequalities and it calls for a commitment to a future where safety is not a privilege but a universal norm and where Canadian skies are truly open to all.Structured across six chapters, this thesis delves deep into the core of aviation safety governance in Canada, revealing a narrative rife with injustice and neglect. Drawing upon a comprehensive analysis of relevant treaties, regulations, policies, case studies, and socio-political theories, this research investigates the multifaceted State Factors that fuel a pernicious form of systemic discrimination in northern Canadian aviation. Its findings underscore how systemic failures stemming from government (in)action in Canada perpetuate safety disparities among northern indigenous communities and exacerbate their socio-economic vulnerabilities. This thesis further advocates for targeted policy and legal reforms, and lays out a strategic litigation roadmap to confront this form of discrimination. Ultimately, it proposes a holistic approach to enhance aviation safety and promote equality for indigenous peoples, emphasizing the critical importance of uniform regulations and oversight, equitable resource allocation, and inclusive policymaking across Canada's civil aviation regime

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0140.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCanadian Policy and Governance→French-language works237,207→