MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161971247 · doi:10.82308/48876

Réflexions à l'usage des traducteurs d'œuvres autochtones écrites en anglais : pour une décolonisation de la traduction, suivies de "Le club des Premières Épouses : à la façon salishe de la côte" de Lee Maracle

2023· dissertation· fr· W7161971247 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melissa Major

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPoliticsPremiseIndigenous cultureVernacular

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the majority of Indigenous writers in North America write in English and since the majority of their translators are non-Indigenous, I started thinking about an ethical and decolonized translation, towards French, of Indigenous literary works written in English. The premise of this thesis is that a story written in English by an Indigenous author cannot be translated the same way a story written by a Canadian or American author is. This is explained by the fact that Indigenous literary works are often political, that their authors come from cultures and worldviews that are very different from the ones of western authors and that there is a power relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Peoples. My reflection is based on the critical and theoretical work of certain western intellectuals, such as the translation scholar Antoine Berman, but mainly on the work of Indigenous writers, intellectuals, and scholars such as Craig S. Womack (Creek/Cherokee) and Kristina Fagan (Labrador Metis). In the first chapter of my thesis, I take an interest in the translation of literary works by Indigenous authors in Canada, in the two official languages. Since 2010, more and more Indigenous works have been translated, mostly from English to French. I study the political aspect of Indigenous stories and explain the aim of several Indigenous stories, which are healing, compassion, and reappropriation. I also draw attention to certain pitfalls that are often found in the translation of Indigenous literatures: ethnocentrism, rationalization, clarification, the “destruction of the vernacular networks”, and exoticisation which are, in the opinion of Berman, frequent “distorting tendencies” in translation. To these pitfalls, I add the desire to respond to the readers’ horizon of expectation, the lack of knowledge of Indigenous cultures, the desire to reveal everything, and the difficulty of translating Indigenous humour. I explore the relationship of Indigenous writers with the language of the colonizers before looking into Rez Englishes, these dialects that are found in some Indigenous works. In the second chapter, I highlight practical translation problems in two books of the Salish-Stó:lō author Lee Maracle as well as a few particularities of her writing. Finally, in the last chapter, I apply the result of my reflections to a translation of Maracle’s short story collection, First Wives Club: Coast Salish Style (2010), that is resolutely attached to the letter of the text

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.017
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→