MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161978083 · doi:10.82308/1722

A population-based association study of toll-like receptor signaling pathway gene polymorphisms in chronic rhinosinusitis

2009· dissertation· en· W7161978083 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marc Tewfik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSinusitis and nasal conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismPopulationChronic rhinosinusitisSNPChronic diseaseGenetic inheritance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La rhinosinusite chronique (RSC) est une maladie fréquente qui cause l'inflammation des sinus. Les récepteurs Toll-like (TLR) sont importants dans l'immunité innée, répondant aux microorganismes. Nous avons évalué les polymorphismes ponctuels de séquence (SNPs) dans les gènes codant les voies de signalisation TLR chez 206 patients atteints de RSC sévère et 200 témoins. Nous avons aussi investigué l'association entre ces SNPs et le niveau d'IgE sanguin. En tout, 96 sur 104 SNPs ont été génotypés avec succès. Bien que nous ne pouvions pas confirmer l'association avec la RSC, 3 SNPs dans le gène IRAK4 – rs1461567, rs4251513, and rs4251559 – étaient associés a un niveau d'IgE sanguin élevé (p < 0.004). Le résultat a été répliqué dans une seconde population indépendante d'individus souffrant d'asthme provenant du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean (p < 0.031). Ces résultats suggèrent qu'une modification génétique dans le gène IRAK4 prédispose à un niveau élevé d'IgE dans les maladies respiratoires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSinusitis and nasal conditionsFrench-language works237,207