MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161979150 · doi:10.82308/52023

Social network characteristics among adolescents at risk of obesity: a pilot study

2019· dissertation· en· W7161979150 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fatima Almansoori

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Research Topics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial network (sociolinguistics)Data collectionSocial supportSocial network analysisIdentification (biology)ObesityPhysical activityConceptual model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACTContext: Youth obesity has become a global epidemic. Identification of modifiable determinants is needed to develop effective prevention strategies. The Socio-Ecological Model suggests that physical and social environments can both support and inhibit behaviours related to healthy weight. Aspects of one’s personal social network (e.g. size, mode of interactions with contacts, and mean age of network members) might influence health outcomes, such as adiposity in adolescents. Social Network Analysis (SNA) is a conceptual framework, which allows us to investigate the potential relationship of social network characteristics on health-related outcomes. To this end, we developed a questionnaire designed to measure the personal social networks of adolescents and conducted a pilot study.Objective: The main objectives were to describe the structure and characteristics of adolescents’ social networks and to examine whether patterns emerged in relation to adiposity. Methods: We conducted a SNA pilot study nested within the QUALITY study, an ongoing longitudinal study, established in 2005 and designed to investigate the natural history of obesity in Quebec, Canada (n = 630 at baseline). Data were obtained from 46 adolescents during the 3rd phase of data collection when participants were aged 15-17 years old. The outcome was participant’s total body fat percentage measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (%BF). With respect to the SNA data collection, participants (egos) identified up to 10 friends (alters) with whom they discussed important matters. Participants also reported both their own and perceived alters’ lifestyle behaviours, and connections between alters. Characteristics of alters were combined to create the following indicators of support and encouragement: Positive role models (friends who often or sometimes participated in physical activities and eating healthy food), of cheerleaders (positive role models who often or sometimes encouraged the ego to be physically active) and negative role models (friends who rarely or never participated in physical activity and who rarely or never ate healthfully). For each indicator, proportions were computed for each ego network. Analysis: Descriptive statistics were generated for all variables, including network- and ego-level variables. Correlations were computed between all variables, and notably with the outcome, %BF. Sex-specific multilinear regression analyses were performed to further explore the relationship between potential network features and adiposity. Results: The final analytical sample included 28 boys and 16 girls with an average age for both of 16.3 years, and a total of 207 alters. The average %BF was 19.8% for boys and 34.2% for girls. The average proportion of cheerleaders in the network of boys was on average 0.23 and for girls an average of 0.14. Among boys, each increase in tertile of cheerleaders was associated with a decrease in the %BF by almost 8%. In contrast, a modest positive association was observed in girls.Conclusion: Perceived behaviours and encouragement of friends may be associated with adiposity in high-risk youth, but this relationship appears to differ between adolescent boys and girls. Although longitudinal investigations are needed, these preliminary findings suggest that leveraging social networks to enhance lifestyle interventions likely need to be sensitive to gender-based beliefs.Keywords: Obesity, adolescents, pilot study, questionnaire, weight-related lifestyle behaviours, friends, social network

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMental Health Research Topics→French-language works237,207→