MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7161986809 · doi:10.82308/53055

Spatial modeling of soil heterogeneities and their impacts on runoff, sediment and total phosphorus loss

2013· dissertation· en· W7161986809 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alaba Boluwade

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeostatisticsSpatial variabilityHydrology (agriculture)Soil and Water Assessment ToolSoil waterKrigingVariogramSedimentEutrophication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Located in southern Quebec, at the northeastern extremity of Lake Champlain, the Missisquoi Bay is subject to eutrophication arising from excess nutrients, predominantly phosphorus (P), contributed by agricultural runoff. Land use patterns, agronomic practices, soil properties, and geomorphology have an impact on soil P. Studies have used hydrologic models [e.g., the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)] to characterize P loadings from the region's agricultural watersheds. The lack of a proper understanding of the impact of spatial variability and heterogeneity of soil properties on the prediction of runoff, sediment and nutrient movement has proven a major challenge. In order to overcome this, field surveys, spatial variability characterization of P through geostatistics, heterogeneity quantification and hydrologic modeling using SWAT were undertaken. An extensive geostatistic study of soil properties was followed by the use of SWAT to predict runoff, sediment and total phosphorus (TP). Soil surveys carried out in the summers of 2011 and 2012 measured soils physical and chemical properties. Variogram analysis characterized the spatial variability of soil test phosphorus (STP). Ordinary kriging (OK) was used to estimate STP values at unsampled locations. Due to OK's smoothing effect, some high value areas were underestimated, while some low areas were overestimated. Compared to OK, sequential Gaussian simulation (SGS) helped characterize the uncertainty and provides better estimates at non-sampled locations. Areas above the STP threshold at which P has the potential to move to freshwater after precipitation events, combined with topographic factors, were identified. The uncertainty in variogram parameters (sill, nugget and range) was characterized using a Bayesian Hierarchical framework, aiding in understanding the complexity and heterogeneity in the STP dataset attributable to land use patterns. The Posterior mean and 95% credible confidence intervals of the variogram parameters and STP values were developed. An Independent Component Analysis (ICA) technique, which overcame the problem of matrix inversion in co-simulation, served in the decomposition of spatially-correlated geochemical variables. This implementation was tested on three correlated variables: magnesium, calcium and iron. The measured soil properties required by SWAT were regionalized and clustered using a Regionalization with Constrained Clustering and Partitioning (REDCAP) algorithm. Five maps were created based on 5, 10, 15, 20 and 24 part partitioning. Each of these maps had different measures of heterogeneity and each was used as inputs for five different configurations of SWAT. Mean monthly flow, sediment and total P load from April 2001 to December 2002 were used to assess model performance before and after calibration. Overall, there was no significant difference in runoff simulation between any of the five map configurations, which might be due to the impacts of the SCS-CN (soil conservation service-curve number) method in simulating runoff. In the study watershed, using a higher resolution (number of regions) of soil data did not improve predictions of monthly streamflow, sediment or TP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Geostatistics and MappingFrench-language works237,207