MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161988426 · doi:10.82308/55488

The sheet of impact melt at West Clearwater Lake, Northern Quebec

2012· dissertation· en· W7161988426 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel Rosa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrecciaClastic rockPlagioclasePillow lavaMaficLithologyImpact structureUltramafic rockVolcano

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The meteorite impact that formed the 32-km-wide Upper Pennsylvanian (285 ± 23 Ma) West Clearwater structure, situated about 125 km east of the Hudson Bay arc, northern Quebec, formed a sheet of impact melt now exposed on a central ring of islands. Crater-fill deposits exposed on the ring of islands can be divided into three major successive units, which are, in ascending order: 1) a red, friable impact-melt-bearing fragmental breccia 0 to 20 m thick cut by small (cm to dm) dykes of impact melt; 2) a red, massive, clast-rich impact-generated melt about 18 meters thick containing up to 25% clasts > 1 mm in size, and 3) a massive poorly jointed clast-poor impact-generated melt containing <15% clasts greater than 1 mm in size, at least 85 m thick, with a matrix that shows an ophitic to subophitic texture. The average composition of the West Clearwater Lake impact melt, which has a bulk composition similar to that of a trachyandesitic volcanic rock, can be modeled by mixing the average chemical compositions of three types of lithologies present in the vicinity of the impact structure: 1) granitic rocks, 2) granodioritic, enderbitic and tonalitic rocks, and 3) mafic and ultramafic rocks, according to the following proportions: 1) 31%, 2) 62% and 3) 6%. The order of crystallization of the melt was plagioclase + Fe-Ti oxides + clinopyroxene + sanidine + apatite + quartz. The initial clast content in the clast-poor melt, before the onset of crystallization, must have been much higher. This conclusion is supported by the widespread occurrence in the clast-poor impact melt rock of plagioclase grains with an irregular, partially resorbed relict core. In thin section, plagioclase xenocrysts now form ~5% to ~15% of the clast-poor impact melt rock, depending on the thin section. The preferential preservation of plagioclase as a clast implies that the melt quickly equilibrated to temperatures below the liquidus and within the range of plagioclase crystallization. Two-feldspar thermometry calculations suggest that the last plagioclase and the first alkali feldspar crystallized at temperatures of about 781 to 816°C (±44°C). Quartz, the last phase to crystallize in the clast-poor impact melt rock, formed at temperatures of 700 to 730°C, with an activity of Ti in quartz between 0.5 and 0.6. This study is the first to employ Ti-in-quartz geothermometry to estimate the temperature of solidification of a melt sheet created by a meteoritic impact. Because the melt crystallized anhydrous minerals, it is possible that the melt was highly undersaturated at the liquidus but had achieved H2O saturation at the solidus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlanetary Science and Exploration→French-language works237,207→