MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161988972 · doi:10.82308/45578

The role of physical activity, obesity and perception of weight status in the prevention of elevated blood pressure in youth: biological and behavioral investigations

2010· dissertation· en· W7161988972 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ekaterina Maximova

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObesityAnthropometryBlood pressurePhysical activityPsychological interventionCohortOverweightRegression analysisWeight loss

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Effective interventions to prevent obesity in youth are needed in order to alleviate the public health burden associated with elevated blood pressure (BP). However, interventions designed to prevent obesity through increased physical activity levels have had limited success. Objectives: This thesis has four objectives: 1) to assess the impact of changes in adiposity indicators on increases in systolic blood pressure (SBP) during adolescence; 2) to examine the longitudinal association between declines in physical activity and SBP in youth; 3) to assess whether weight status misperception is associated with exposure to overweight/obese people at home or in school; 4) to examine if weight status misperception is associated with the level of participation in physical activity. Methods: SBP and anthropometry were assessed biannually (1999/2000, 2002, 2004) in a cohort of 1293 Montréal adolescents aged 12-13 years in 1999. Self-report 7-day recalls of physical activity sessions ≥5 minutes were collected every three months over five years. The repeated SBP measurements were analyzed using individual growth models to assess the effect of changes in adiposity indicators on SBP change. Estimates of initial level and rate of decline in number of physical activity sessions per week from individual growth models were used as predictors of BP in linear regression models to assess the effect of declines in physical activity on BP. The hypotheses that youth exposed to obesity at home and in school are more likely to underestimate their weight status, and that those who underestimate their weight status are less likely to engage in physical activity were tested in a provincially representative, school-based sample of 3665 youth (age 9, n = 1267; age 13, n = 1186; age 16, n = 1212). Multi-level linear regression models were used to assess the association between parent and schoolmate BMI, and weight status misperception (i.e., the standardized difference between self-perception of weight status and actual weight status). Poisson regression models were used to assess the association between weight status misperception and physical activity. Results: 1) Despite sex differences in mean SBP changes, the magnitude of the effect of one unit change in each adiposity indicator on SBP change was similar in boys and girls. 2) Physical activity declined during adolescence and a decline of one physical activity session per week with each year of age was associated with higher BP. 3) Majority of overweight youth underestimated their weight status. Higher parent and schoolmate BMI were associated with greater weight status underestimation. 4) Youth who underestimated their weight status were less likely to engage in physical activity. Conclusion: These findings support the need for interventions to prevent excess weight and physical inactivity during adolescence to prevent higher BP in youth. Weight status misperception may reduce motivation among youth to engage in physical activity, and therefore hinder the success of obesity prevention interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet→French-language works237,207→