MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7161994566 · doi:10.82308/15207

Comparing lower limb bone mineral density between female collegiate athletes and sedentary controls

2017· dissertation· en· W7161994566 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jessica Insogna

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone mineralOsteoporosisOsteopeniaAthletesBone densityPelvisTrochanterPhysical activity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bone is a dynamic, living tissue that can respond to mechanical stress, muscular activity, and strengthen over time. It is constantly broken down and rebuilt in a process known as remodeling. When slightly less bone is deposited than resorbed, it results in osteopenia and eventually osteoporosis, which predisposes the bone to fracture during minimal trauma. Osteoporosis is a condition of generalized skeletal fragility, or "weak bones". According to the Canadian Healthy Aging questionnaire in 2009, 19.2% of women reported being diagnosed with osteoporosis. With the rise of the aging population, the prevalence and cost of osteoporosis is sure to increase as well. The best method of preventing osteoporosis is building strong bones from a young age. Exercise can be used as a factor to build stronger bones at any age. Percussive activity has been shown to lead to increased bone mineral density (BMD), which explains why female athletes tend to have higher BMD than age-matched sedentary controls. This thesis presents a study comparing the BMD of female athletes in hockey and synchronized swimming to sedentary controls. 70 participants, 24 hockey players, 20 synchronized swimmers, and 26 sedentary controls participated in this study. Participants underwent three DXA scans (one total body and two regional scans) and answered a questionnaire about their menstrual history. BMD values were analyzed using ANCOVA controlling for age and weight. Predictors of BMD were also analyzed using step-wise regression. A significant difference in BMD at the level of the trochanter (F(2,65) = 5.47, p < 0.01), pelvis (F(2,65) = 23.65, p < 0.01), legs (F(2,65) = 8.40, p < 0.01), and the lumbar vertebra (F(2,65) = 9.959, p < 0.01) was found. Female hockey players had higher BMD at these sites than synchronized swimmers and sedentary controls. There was no difference between synchronized swimmers and sedentary controls at these sites. There was no difference in BMD at the femur (F(2,65) = 2.201, p = .119), femoral shaft (F(2,65) = 2.002, p = .143), femoral neck (F(2,65) = 0.298, p = .743), and ward's triangle (F(2,65) = 1.705, p = .196) between groups. The findings of this study have important practical implications for strength and conditioning coaches that are training synchronized swimmers or other low or no impact sports. Monitoring female athletes' bone health in university is critical seeing as the peak bone mineral density achieved now will be a large factor in determining their risk for osteoporosis later in life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBone health and osteoporosis research→French-language works237,207→