MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162003916 · doi:10.59236/emro.v26i10a8344

Twice Colonized

2024· article· W7162003916 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Beth Hall

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousColonialismMindsetConfusionHumiliationIndigenous culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed by Film MovementProduced by Emile Hertling Péronard, Alethea Arnaquq-Baril, Stacey Aglok MacDonald, and Bob MooreDirected by Lin Alluna2023, Streaming, 92 mins At a young age, Aaju Peter left her native land of Iqaluit, Canada to pursue studies in Denmark. As an Inuit in a foreign land, she experienced first-hand the colonial mindset and judgements of people around her. Throughout this film, Aaju expresses the frustration and confusion of meeting modern day society’s expectations and prejudices of indigenous peoples. Aaju Peter grew to be a lawyer who now fights for indigenous rights. Still to this day, Iniut peoples are fighting just to have a say in what happens to their native land. From overfishing and seal hunting by outsiders, the Inuit people still struggle to survive in a modern world that often overlooks indigenous populations. This documentary is an essential companion to understanding the devastating effects of colonialism on indigenous people. While we often discuss the past in relation to the mistreatment of native people, we tend to overlook the mistreatment continuing today. By providing Aaju Peter a platform to discuss the dark past and present, director Lin Alluna is giving the Inuit people a chance to share their side of history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducational Media Reviews OnlineSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207