Le manque en partage. Configurations du politique chez Michel Beaulieu et Gilbert Langevin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This doctoral thesis is dedicated to the study of the forms of community and filiations in the works of Michel Beaulieu (1941-1985) and Gilbert Langevin (1938-1995). Immediately after the "poétique du pays" and at the same time as the "new writing" and "counter culture" movements, these two Quebec poets were wary of traditional forms of community (People, Nation, any grouping based on a unitarian conception). Important figures of the literary environment since the sixties, with ties to many different poetic movements, Beaulieu and Langevin remain determinedly faithful in their pursuit of a personal writing. This thesis aims at bringing to light the conception of community peculiar to their poetics, which is situated outside oppositions such as respect for tradition vs. a break/rupture with the past or open disapproval vs. narrow-minded adherence. The hypothesis guiding this project is that these works try to express a "hollow" community. Indeed, the association to a collective project aiming towards a definite purpose — political or poetic —, is improbable for them and their writings demonstrate more loss than union, more dispersal than assemblage ; their verses sound the knell of groupings, gatherings, assemblies. For these poets, the real filiation is based not on what people share but rather on what they lack. Thus the common world in their poetry is linked to a personal event (a memory, an encounter, a fleeting moment of solidarity, etc.) and is based on a "social condition" and not on a common project or allegiance to a group or ideology. This thesis situates Beaulieu and Langevin, who have been neglected by criticism, in the literary context of the period and seeks to reveal and describe a "politics of writing" (J. Rancière) and to delineate the configurations of community inscribed in the very syntax of their work and elaborated in their poetics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".