MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162019717 · doi:10.82308/38842

"Les Girls en voyage": Gender, architecture, and mobility in the mid-twentieth century

2021· dissertation· en· W7162019717 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yildiz Mehmetoglu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture, Modernity, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperFocus groupMobilitiesFocus (optics)FeminismDimension (graph theory)Inclusion (mineral)Feminist theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation examines the role of travel and mobility in the lives of women in architecture. How did women, by traveling, writing, and designing, give voice and vision to their life stories? In contrast to linear biographies depicting universal and unique subjects, this study asserts partial, collective, spatial, feminist, and mobile life stories. It studies a group of women architects and planners who lived and worked in Canada, the United States, and England in the mid-twentieth century: Blanche Lemco van Ginkel, Jean Wallbridge, and Mary Imrie from Canada; Denise Scott Brown from South Africa and the United States; and Jaqueline Tyrwhitt and Alison Smithson from England. My focus on mobility provides a fresh understanding of these pioneering women and shows a completely overlooked dimension of their lives and work. Revisiting individual and collective stories through the notion of mobility helps to situate women as protagonists who shaped professional settings according to their needs. This approach encourages the recognition of the wide range of contributions by women to architectural knowledge, design, education, and networking in the mid-twentieth century. Moreover, zooming in on the mobile parts of their lives shifts the focus of feminist architectural history on the constraints that women architects faced, and rather offers a more positive, constructive, and inclusive history.By assessing alternative forms of evidence, such as diaries, home movies, novels, newspaper clippings, photographs, and letters, in addition to more traditional interviews and architectural sources, this study challenges institutional production as the singular means of professional status. The analysis of women’s movement reveals the extent of networks, mentorships, and friendships they formed in different geographies, institutions, vehicles, and landscapes. Mobility allowed women to blur gendered boundaries embedded in the architectural profession and the traditional genre of biography. Through the design, use, and representation of spaces and vehicles of mobility, women did not only transgress borders, but also claimed spatial and professional agency. Being mobile created new roles for women in architecture

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArchitecture, Modernity, and DesignFrench-language works237,207