MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7162029108 · doi:10.82308/24889

Habitat use by breeding and molting red-breasted mergansers in the Gulf of St. Lawrence

2010· dissertation· en· W7162029108 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shawn Robert Craik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHabitatSalt marshPopulationNest (protein structural motif)Intertidal zoneWaderTernMarshEstuary

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The choice of habitat plays an important role on the population dynamics of ducks (Anatinae). However, little is known of the patterns of habitat use by nearctic Red-breasted Mergansers (Mergus serrator). From 2002 to 2006, I studied habitat use and selection by breeding and molting Red-breasted Mergansers in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada, by measuring macro- and microhabitat and obtaining radio telemetry, time-activity, and stomach content information. My objectives were to examine 1) nest-site selection, 2) brood habitat selection, and 3) habitat use by flightless male mergansers. Concealment was the most important feature for nest placement by Red-breasted Mergansers on Tern Islands at Kouchibouguac National Park, New Brunswick. Over 95% of nests were in dense stands of marram grass (Ammophila breviligulata), and overhead concealment, vegetation density, and vegetation height at nests were greater than that at random sites. Microhabitat at successful nests was similar to that at unsuccessful nests. Radio-marked broods originating from Tern Islands moved large distances (>3 km) to rearing habitat and remained highly mobile throughout the rearing period (mean = 1.0 km/day). Broods selected shallow waters (<75 cm) over continental estuarine intertidal flats and in tidal streams, and avoided tidal rivers and marine habitats. Age class I broods (≤10 days post-nest exodus) selected continental estuarine intertidal, tidal stream, and saltmarsh habitats, whereas older broods often used estuarine subtidal wetlands. By the early brood-rearing period, most male Red-breasted Mergansers had migrated from Kouchibouguac National Park to molting sites. At Anticosti Island, Québec, I estimated that males were flightless for 30-33 days between late July and early September. Flightless males used clear, shallow waters (≤12 m) near shore (<850 m) in coastal bays with a sand-rock substrate and stands of submergent algae. Foraging flocks were generally restricted to intertidal and shallow subtidal areas (<4 m), whereas nonforaging flocks often used deeper subtidal sites. These observations were consistent with analyses of stomach contents, which indicated that males fed on small, inshore fish, particularly grubby (Myoxocephalus aenaeus) and sandlance (Ammodytes spp.). My thesis identifies factors influencing the distribution of breeding and molting Red-breasted Mergansers in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and prioritizes future research that will provide additional insight into habitat selection and its implication on survival of this species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAvian ecology and behavior→French-language works237,207→