Investigating the early role of oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease: Insights from a transgenic model of the amyloid pathology and fluorescence imaging methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With an aging population, the negative impact of age-related diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) will only grow. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia in the elderly and there are no cures nor preventative treatments. AD has an extended pre-symptomatic stage spanning decades which offers a promising therapeutic window. However, it is presently impossible to unquestionably diagnose AD during this early stage in the general population. Consequently, basic science research on pathological mechanisms that initiate and exacerbate disease progression during the earliest, pre-plaque stage would be insightful for biomarker development and disease-modifying therapies. Studies from our laboratory using a transgenic rat model of the AD-like amyloid pathology and post-mortem human brain material, demonstrated that neurons burdened with Aβ exhibited increased gene and protein expression of inflammatory markers. This early neuroinflammation, which vastly differs from the classical inflammatory process during late, post-plaque stages, motivated our investigation of oxidative stress, which can be a cause and consequence of inflammation. Oxidative stress is elevated during post-plaque stages of AD, but its earliest role in AD remains uncharacterized. As such, Chapter 2 investigates neuron-specific gene and protein expression of oxidative stress-related targets in our rat model during a pre-plaque stage when neuroinflammation is incipient. We show that intraneuronal Aβ- (iAβ) burdened neurons exhibited evidence of DNA damage and had upregulated DNA repair and antioxidant genes and proteins, while oxidative damage trended to increase, suggesting this timepoint preceded a fully realized redox imbalance. Our findings reveal that inflamed iAβ-burdened neurons increase expression of oxidative stress-related genes, likely in response to elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS). Importantly, ROS production is upstream of oxidative stress responses including modulation of gene expression. Therefore, our next goal was to develop methodologies for reliably studying ROS. Quantifying ROS is technically challenging since they are short-lived and include diverse chemical species. Therefore, detection methods must be specific to the ROS of interest. With this in mind, we utilized the fluorogenic probe, H4BPMHC (developed by the McGill Cosa laboratory), that quantifies lipid peroxyl radicals, a form of lipid-associated ROS which neurons are vulnerable to. After optimizing culturing and imaging conditions in primary neurons, we validated in vitro sensitivity of this method by subjecting neurons to varying antioxidant loads over time then imaging them under stressed and non-stressed conditions. In sum, H4BPMHC was sensitive enough to detect differences between our experimental conditions. Chapter 3 presents the proof-of-concept for using H4BPMHC to study lipid peroxyl radicals in neurodegenerative disease models. Finally, building on our expertise from live cell imaging, Chapter 4 outlines the development of a methodology for studying ROS in ex vivo hippocampal slices using two-photon microscopy. Existing ROS detection methods have limited spatial and temporal resolution that real-time in situ imaging would overcome. Towards this goal, this chapter provides key considerations, limitations, and potential pitfalls when quantifying ROS in complicated but biologically relevant systems. Overall, we show that a neuronal oxidative stress response occurs during the early, pre-plaque amyloid pathology and demonstrate the rigor necessary for developing methods of ROS quantification in disease-relevant models. This interdisciplinary work will provide a solid foundation and path forward for future studies investigating the earliest AD pathology as well as the role of oxidative stress in health and disease
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".