Quantum cryptographic dynamics: modeling cryptosystems via entropy operators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces Quantum Cryptographic Dynamics (QCD), a novel theoretical framework that models cryptographic processes through the lens of entropy injection and ejection. Drawing inspiration from classical mechanics, QCD establishes three fundamental laws: the Entropy Inertial Law (conservation of entropy in isolated systems), the Entropy Evolution Law (transformation of entropy via injection operators), and the Entropy Redistribution Law (reversibility through ejection operators). Applying these principles, we provide a unified, entropy-centric interpretation of classical and quantum cryptographic schemes, including symmetric-key systems, public-key protocols, and post-quantum cryptography (PQC) algorithms such as Learning With Errors (LWE), Kyber, and Homomorphic Polynomial Public Key (HPPK). By shifting the focus from computational hardness assumptions to the fundamental dynamics of entropy manipulation, QCD offers new insights into the security foundations of these cryptographic primitives. Furthermore, we reinterpret the Quantum Permutation Pad Random Number Generator (QPP-RNG) within the QCD framework. QPP-RNG is modeled as an entropy-driven process that harnesses system jitter to generate unpredictable random numbers, which in turn fuel PQC schemes like Kyber and HPPK for quantum-secure key establishment, forming a self-sustained quantum-secure eco-cryptosystem. This framework provides a rigorous approach to security analysis, unifying cryptographic security models across classical, quantum, and post-quantum domains. QCD establishes a robust foundation for designing quantum-resistant cryptographic primitives and assessing the fundamental security properties of cryptographic systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it