MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162035438 · doi:10.82308/51124

Clairvoyant bodies: Bodily anachrony and trauma in contemporary north American fiction

2019· dissertation· en· W7162035438 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Stunden

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNarrative Theory and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeEmbodied cognitionMeaning (existential)PsychicNarratologyCrueltyWhite (mutation)MetaphorGesture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lacunae are common currency in trauma fiction. Whether taking the shape of cognitive ellipses or intergenerational blockages, the gaps in which testimony ought to be present proliferate in literature representing traumatic experience. Accompanying the linguistic and structural lacunae in trauma literature, however, is a prevalent narrative phenomenon in which a fictional body registers the physical, psychic, and spiritual suffering centralized in a particular text. In these cases, embodied sensations such as nausea, suffocation, loss of consciousness, and even arousal testify to the painful realities of individuals and communities that cannot and have not been overtly disclosed. Contributing to substantiated work on feminist narratology, my research also offers one possible approach to the development of a racial narratology by investigating the formal and temporal intricacies of texts in which the primary moments of unprocessed and unnarrated traumatic rupture are the result of patriarchal white supremacist practices. In my investigation of fictional texts from the 20th and 21st centuries in North America, I establish a repeated pattern in which the texts' central traumas and their social and psychic meaning are narrated non-verbally through cues or gestures embedded in the plot—what I call bodily anachrony. For a reader to engage ethically with a text, then, these non-verbal methods of narration, in concert with the reader's embodied non-verbal responses, must be parsed alongside the more readily available verbal ones.The opening chapter of this dissertation asks how the asphyxiation suffered by the protagonist of William Faulkner's "Pantaloon in Black" might challenge the unnarratability of the racist trauma of lynching through its anticipation of a violence purposefully withheld from the reader. Building on the discussion of "bodily anachrony" developed in Chapter 1, Chapter 2 on James Baldwin's "Going to Meet the Man" asks how both the sexual arousal and impotence experienced by white deputy Jesse enables readerly access to a narrative of trauma chained to Jesse's repressed childhood experience of anti-Black racist violence. Turning from a focus on the narrative dynamics of race to a focus on gender, I investigate the shadow story of patriarchal self-control made present to the reader through her bodily engagement with fictional self-harm in Margaret Atwood's Cat's Eye. The final chapter returns to the concept of shadow story to discuss the possibility for surrogate testimony to the legacy of Canadian residential schools produced through the disembodied presence of ghosts in Eden Robinson's Monkey Beach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.022
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNarrative Theory and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207