MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7162039001 · doi:10.82308/44842

Individual and combined effects of obesity and COPD on exertional breathlessness: Insights from the CanCOLD study

2024· dissertation· en· W7162039001 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emily Russell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCOPDObesityObstructive lung diseasePulmonary diseaseCohortLung volumesExertional dyspneaDiseaseCohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) co-exist in an increasing number of patients, and activity-related breathlessness is a prevalent and often disabling symptomatic manifestation in those who are obese (OB) and have COPD (OB-COPD). Numerous studies report that OB-COPD patients report higher (i.e., worse) levels of activity-related breathlessness (at rest and during exercise) compared to their normal weight (NW) counterparts. However, the physiological mechanisms of relatively greater breathlessness in OB-COPD patients remains unclear and largely understudied. The aim of this study was to examine the individual and combined effects of obesity and COPD on exertional breathlessness. Methods: 585 participants who completed a cycle CPET as part of Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) Visit 1 were included. Participants were identified into four groups: (i) NW-NONCOPD (n=233) with a BMI = 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 and no COPD; (ii) OB-NONCOPD (n=185) with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and no COPD; (iii) NW-COPD (n=93) with a BMI = 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 and COPD [defined by a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < lower limit of normal (LLN)]; and (iv) OB-COPD (n=74) with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and COPD. Results: Our study demonstrates that OB-COPD patients have a higher metabolic demand, ventilatory demand, and worse dynamic breathing mechanics relative to their NW counterparts. However, the static and dynamic perceptual (ie. breathlessness) responses are minimized due to obesity-related reductions in operating lung volumes. Conclusion: We are the first to demonstrate in this study, that is the largest of its kind that we are aware of and with our experimental design that includes NW- and OB- NonCOPD control groups, the interaction between COPD and obesity on the behaviour of dynamic operating lung volumes and exertional breathlessness responses during symptom-limited incremental cycling CPET

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research→French-language works237,207→