Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distributed by The Video Project, 145 - 9th St., Suite 230, San Francisco, CA 94103; 800-475-2638Produced by Stuart Henderson and Victoria LeanDirected by Victoria Lean2023, Streaming, 44 mins The Climate Baby Dilemma delves into a critical ethical question: should we bring children into a world facing severe climate challenges? The film provides a comprehensive examination of the personal and societal implications of parenthood amid environmental uncertainty. Inspired by Dr. Britt Wray's insights on emotional responses to climate change, the film explores how a generation is grappling with the ethical considerations of raising children in an era of ecological instability. It effectively opens conversations about deep-seated anxieties and ethical dilemmas regarding climate change and parenthood. The Climate Baby Dilemma offers diverse perspectives that provide a comprehensive view of the emotional and ethical complexities surrounding climate change and parenthood. Activists with differing views on this subject offer insights into their decision to have—or not to have—children. Are children a sign of hope, or are they being brought into an overburdened world with an uncertain future? Both points of view are explored. The film underscores the urgent need for immediate action to secure a future for all children and highlights the critical importance of systemic changes to protect marginalized communities disproportionately affected by climate impacts. The documentary also explores the youth-driven movement to abstain from having children until significant climate action is achieved, framing it as activism and a demand for urgent environmental stewardship. It shares deeply personal journeys of reconciling the desire for parenthood with the grim realities of climate science. The film also addresses differing generational perspectives when an activist explains to her mother why she made the decision not to have children. By addressing the ways race and privilege significantly influence these decisions, the filmmaker challenges us to understand why these activists have such different views on the future. Sarain Fox, an Anishinaabe activist and artist, provides a powerful Indigenous perspective, highlighting that for marginalized communities, having children is a form of resistance against colonialism and a way to preserve culture and identity. From the perspective of Severn Cullis-Suzuki, a renowned climate activist, having children encouraged her to fight for sustainable changes that ensure a future for all children. The Climate Baby Dilemma is an excellent catalyst for conversations about the intersection of personal choices and global responsibilities. It serves as an invaluable tool to spark conversations about the ethical dimensions of climate change and parenthood. Victoria Lean's thoughtful approach and inclusive storytelling make this documentary accessible to everyone. It leaves the viewer to ponder what it means to love and protect future generations amidst planetary uncertainty. Awards:Cannes Corporate Media & TV Awards, Silver Winner; US International Awards, Gold Camera, Social Issues; Yorkton Film Festival, Golden Sheaf for Best Documentary POV; Worldfest Houston, Gold, Long/Short Documentary
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.086 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".