MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7162078266 · doi:10.82308/45479

Impact of UV disinfection on the virulence and antibiotic resistance gene profile of Escherichia coli in municipal wastewater and its receiving waters

2013· dissertation· en· W7162078266 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melanie Yip Woon Sun

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEscherichia coli research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirulenceEscherichia coliAntibiotic resistancePathogenic Escherichia coliWastewaterPopulationAntibioticsBacteriaPathogenic bacteriaFeces

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fecal water contaminations have been known to cause severe disease outbreaks throughout the world, thus proper wastewater treatment can help to avoid them. Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a well-known microorganism that flourishes in the gut of warm-blooded animals and can cause disease, such as diarrhoea, urinary tract infection, dysentery-like illness, haemorrhagic colitis and neonatal meningitis. Previous studies have shown that the virulence gene profile of E. coli can accurately predict its in vivo pathogenicity in animal models. E. coli in municipal wastewaters was therefore used in this study as a model pathogenic microorganism to examine the effects of activated sludge and UV disinfection on its virulence and its antibiotic resistance gene profile. DNA microarrays were used to conduct genotyping. The virulence and antibiotic resistance gene profile of E. coli in the receiving waters impacted by the treatment plant were also investigated.E. coli isolates (540 in total) were collected in May 2011 from 6 locations at the Skyway Wastewater Treatment Plant (Burlington, Ontario) and the Hamilton Harbour, which is the receiving water body for the treatment plant's effluent. Samples were also collected from an avian-contaminated area to investigate a possible relationship between the pollution in the harbour and the pollution by wild birds and municipal effluents. Results showed that although UV disinfection decreased the E. coli counts by more than 2 logs, the percentage of E. coli with a pathogenic genotype in the surviving population had increased by almost 10%. The activated sludge system proliferated virulence and antibiotic resistance genes. 22.5% of all isolates were uropathogenic E. coli 6.7% incomplete extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli and 1.7% shiga-toxin associated E. coli. No strong correlation was found between the genotypes found in the treatment plant's effluent and the harbour samples. 40% of the treatment plant's isolates carried some antibiotic resistance genes with a higher proportion of isolates carrying multiple antibiotic resistance genes. The majority of the isolates (70%) did not carry any antibiotic resistance (AMR) genes. Most of the AMR genes detected corresponded to beta-lactams (20%), aminoglycosides (19.6%), tetracyclines (19.1%), phenicols (12.6%) and trimethoprim (11.5%). Also, results demonstrated that UV decreased (by 9%) the percentage of isolates that had multiple antibiotic resistance genes, while activated sludge increased this percentage (by 5%). No statistically significant difference was found in the distribution of the antibiotic resistance genes in the harbour samples or between the pathotypes and the presence of antibiotic resistance genes in any samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEscherichia coli research studies→French-language works237,207→