Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distributed by Good DocsProduced by Andréa Schmidt and Shannon WalshDirected by Shannon Walsh2019, Streaming, 87 mins Illusions of Control is about grief, anxiety, optimism, and hardship. The film captures the personal lives of parents searching for their adult children in mass graves, citizens forced to relocate their homes and livelihoods, the everyday realities of living with environmental destruction, and a cancer patient navigating their diagnosis. Viewers could define the film as a study of women’s resilience as it does follow five women and, in fact, some libraries have cataloged the film as such. Yet, the film captures experiences of community members, friends, and family members, so this film is not limited to women’s studies. Others have identified this as an environmental film, but it is not. The environment is only one of the many examples that causes harm (and offers hope) in this film. The filmmakers describe this film as a “meditation on resilience in the face of disaster,” which is the best description. The filming is beautiful, hopeful, and truly artistic. Unfortunately, it is not a film easily adapted for a college or university classroom. Viewers are required to watch the entire documentary as the film jumps around to all 5 stories regularly. This makes it difficult to use in a class needing a shorter viewing time or hoping to follow a single theme. Instructors should note they will need to allot more time for discussing this film perhaps adding supplemental readings and/or presentations because the film does not include narration, or commentary from mental health staff, faith leaders, or related professionals on the themes. Good Docs states closed captions are not included for the English language portions, which also makes it difficult for in-class use when notetaking is needed. The streaming prices for university and college libraries for this documentary are very expensive. The emotional subject matter and meditative style is best viewed with friends, a community group, or as a part of a film series. In summary, this film is more appropriate and affordable for individuals, community groups, or public libraries. For those seeking an environmental documentary about resilience, then I recommend How to Let Go of the World And Love all the Things Climate Can’t Change and Inhabitants For other subjects, search “resilience” in EMRO. Awards:Calgary International Film Festival, Honourable Mention Best Canadian Documentary Award
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".