MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7162088802 · doi:10.82308/4769

Developmental trajectories from childhood sexual abuse to depressive symptoms among adolescent youth involved in Child Protection Services

2020· dissertation· en· W7162088802 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark-Damyan Edwards

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexual abuseLongitudinal studyNeglectChild abuseDepression (economics)Poison controlSuicide preventionInjury preventionChild protection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Childhood sexual abuse (CSA) contributes to depression in various populations and this link has been established using robust longitudinal studies. However, limited studies have examined this link using person-centered approaches, such as with cluster analysis, and longitudinally, with respect to youth who are involved in Child Protection Services (CPS). This is important because victims of CSA do not all experience or respond to CSA in the same way, especially so among youth involved in CPS who report greater co-occurring abuse and neglect, are more likely to have experienced severe CSA, and are less likely to recover from depressive symptoms. Thus, this dissertation included two studies that built upon each other using data from the Maltreatment and Adolescent Pathways (MAP) Longitudinal Study.Study 1 explored profiles of 560 Canadian youth involved in the Ontario child welfare system based on their depressive symptoms, CSA characteristics, and co-occurring abuse and neglect histories. Cluster analysis identified two group clusters. The majority of youth in the first group reported none to minimal CSA, co-occurring abuse and neglect, and depressive symptoms. The majority of the second group were female, reported moderate to severe CSA, co-occurring abuse and neglect, and clinical depressive symptoms. It was also found that youth who reported severe CSA were five times more likely to report clinical depressive symptoms compared to youth who did not report CSA, while controlling for gender and co-occurring abuse. The results highlight the importance of screening for abuse history and severity when treating depression, especially among sexually abused youth involved in CPS.Study 2 examined longitudinal trajectories of depressive symptoms over 18-months among 135 sexually abused youth involved in CPS. Contrary to expectations, depressive symptoms significantly reduced over time. Furthermore, the changes in depressive symptoms varied by CSA severity. Specifically, it was found that reductions of depressive symptoms were significantly associated with CSA severity over time. These findings highlight the value of screening for CSA history and severity when developing targeted interventions for depressive symptoms throughout CPS involvement. As a whole, the findings from this dissertation offer unique evidence that not only should CSA be considered, but its severity and histories of other forms of abuse and neglect are also key factors for mental health screening practices among youth involved in CPS. Future longitudinal research is needed to better understand these findings across youth involved in the child welfare system and help CPS develop effective and sustainable targeted interventions that best meet the needs of its youth. Keywords: Childhood sexual abuse, CSA, depressive symptoms, child protection services, child welfare, longitudinal studies, cluster analysis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChild Abuse and Trauma→French-language works237,207→