MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7162093274 · doi:10.82308/21033

Characterization of pyrene degradation by Mycobacterium sp. strain S65

2002· dissertation· en· W7162093274 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michiei Sho

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyreneFluoranthenePhenanthreneBacteriaStrain (injury)BioaugmentationDioxygenaseNaphthalene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The microbial degradation of pyrene, a 4-ring polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), has been elucidated with the increasing number of pyrene-degrading bacteria that have been isolated in recent years. A pyrene degrading bacterium identified as Mycobacterium sp. strain S65, was isolated from a jet-fuel contaminated site in Sept-Iles, northern Quebec, Canada. S65 utilized pyrene, phenanthrene, and fluoranthene as sole carbon and energy sources, but did not degrade naphthalene, anthracene, and fluorene. Pyrene mineralization was enhanced by adding benz[a]anthracene, benzy[a]pyrene, or phenanthrene as cosubstrates. When added to PAH contaminated soil as a potential bioaugmentation agent, S65 did not appear to survive well, nor was it effective at degrading PAHs under these conditions. Pyrene catabolic genes in S65 were partially characterized by Southern hybridization using a probe constructed from the naphthalene inducible pyrene dioxygenase gene, nidA, from the pyrene-degrading bacterium, Mycobacterium sp. strain PYR-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants→French-language works237,207→