Finding meaning after a head injury : the experience of patients' mothers and wives during the early phase of recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A head injury is an unexpected and potentially life-threatening event that frequently results in physical, cognitive, and emotional changes in the patient. As a result, a head injury affects the whole family, and mothers and wives may be potentially at risk because they tend to assume the primary caregiving role post-trauma. Current thinking is that a person's ability to restore a sense of meaning in life is an important aspect of psychological adjustment following the traumatic injury of a loved one. However, little is currently known about the process of finding meaning during the early phase of recovery. The purpose of this qualitative study was therefore to generate a theory about how mothers and wives find meaning during the early phase of recovery following the head injury of their loved one. Grounded theory methodology was used to explore the experience of 5 mothers and 9 wives whose family member had suffered a moderate or severe head injury. Participants were recruited from three major Level I Canadian trauma centres using inclusion criteria and theoretical sampling to achieve theoretical completeness. They were interviewed on two occasions: 1 to 5 weeks and again 6 to 8 weeks following their family member's head injury. Iterative analysis and constant comparative methods were used throughout the study and the data revealed a process of finding meaning embedded in three distinct phases: "Focusing on the here and now", "Expanding perspective", and "Resuming life". The process of finding meaning was characterized by an emerging fit between the participants' perception of their current situation and their pre-trauma value and belief system. This process helped participants to find a new way of thinking about their world and to find a new order and sense of direction in their lives. The findings of this study augment our theoretical understanding of family members' psychological responses to traumatic events, and may be helpful to guide nursing care of the whole family during the early phase of recovery following a head injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".