Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many academic journals publish articles on aspects of curriculum studies from time to time. In addition, there are many journals concerned with the teaching of particular subjects or areas of the curriculum. The journals listed below are devoted entirely to curriculum studies or aspects of it. Curriculum The journal of the Association for the Study of the Curriculum. A British journal publishing articles from educationists and practising teachers on all aspects of curriculum studies and practice. Published twice a year and available from Nafferton Books, Driffield. Curriculum Inquiry Publishes contributions related to curriculum development, evaluation and theory. Contains major articles, extended critical reviews, and ‘dialogues’ between authors of papers and readers. Very largely American in orientation. Published quarterly and available from J. Wiley and Sons Ltd., 605 Third Avenue, New York, 10158. Curriculum Perspectives Publishes material on curriculum development, evaluation and theory. Has sections devoted to major articles, case studies and book reviews. Contributions are largely Australian. Published twice a year and available from Curriculum Perspectives, Western Australia College of Advanced Education, Churchlands Campus, Pearson Street, Churchlands, Western Australia 6153 Journal of Curriculum Studies An international journal with editors in the United Kingdom, United States, Canada and Australia. Publishes contributions to curriculum theory, planning, evaluation, innovation and practice. Contains major articles, case studies, reports and reviews. Published quarterly and available from Taylor and Francis Ltd., 4 John Street, London WC1N 2ET Studies in Educational Evaluation An international journal publishing empirical evaluation studies, brief abstracts of such studies, and reflections on issues involving the evaluation of curricula. Available from Pergamon Press Ltd., Headington Hill Hall, Oxford OX3 OBW The Journal of Curriculum Theorizing Invites material concerned with curriculum theory, history and criticism. Especially concerned with publishing articles from reconceptualists. Almost entirely American in orientation. Published twice a year and available from the Journal of Curriculum Theorising, University of Rochester, Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Centre for the Study of Curriculum and Teaching, Rochester, New York State 14627
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.055 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".